Score urgency, relationship value, cost and complexity to see whether litigation, mediation or arbitration fits a dispute — explained in an AI report.
Quick answer
Scores your priorities - relationship, control, privacy, speed and finality - and suggests whether litigation, mediation or arbitration likely fits; the output prompts a discussion rather than deciding for you.
Disclaimer: this page and its AI report are for process reference only. They do not constitute legal advice and are not a binding recommendation of forum. The choice of route stays with you and a qualified attorney.
Methodology: factors are a structural adaptation of common dispute-resolution selection heuristics, not an official model; scores are indicative.
Not every dispute belongs in court. This matcher scores urgency, how much the ongoing relationship matters, cost tolerance and case complexity, then suggests whether litigation, mediation or arbitration fits best — and produces an AI report explaining the reasoning so you can bring a focused question to counsel.
Sample form and AI report preview (live - fill it in to generate the report).
Everything you need to run this template.
Urgency, relationship value, cost tolerance and complexity.
Litigation, mediation and arbitration scored side by side.
A printable PDF explaining the suggested match.
A QR on the report opens follow-up questions.
From copy to deliverable in four steps.
Copy it and confirm the factors for your practice.
Rate urgency, relationship value, cost tolerance and complexity 1–5.
Auto-score and produce a route-fit AI PDF.
Scan the QR to discuss the shortlist before deciding.
Pick your role — see how it fits your workflow.
Guide clients to the right forum before filing.
Screen incoming disputes against consistent criteria.
Understand options before the first lawyer call.
What makes this template work as a professional deliverable.
A preview of real questions — the full version adds scoring and a personalized report per respondent.
