Get Started Free
🎓 Education & E-Learning

Free Instructor Feedback Template

Rate an instructor on clarity, subject command, questioning, feedback and fairness on a 1-5 scale, then generate a personalized AI PDF development report.

1-5 rated dimensions
aggregated before review
AI PDF Report
Live Preview

Quick answer

Rate an instructor on clarity, subject command, questioning, feedback and fairness on a 1-5 scale, then generate a personalized AI PDF development report.

💡

About this template

Instructor feedback usually arrives as two extremes: a five-star average that teaches nothing, or a complaint that names nobody. This form rates five teaching dimensions and produces a personalized AI PDF development report - where the instructor is strong, where responses dropped, and two concrete changes for the next session. Run it per cohort and per session, review it aggregated before it reaches the instructor, and the conversation moves from personality to practice.

🖥️

Live Preview

Fillable sample instructor feedback preview, showing the rated items and the personalized AI report each respondent gets.

Loading…
Loading…
Fill it in to see how responses flow.
Loading…
Loading…
Sample AI report with scoring visuals and recommendations, printable as a PDF.
📦

What's Included

Everything you need to run this template.

1

Five dimensions, one plan

Rated separately, so the development plan targets a practice.

2

Aggregate before feedback

A minimum number of responses per session keeps it fair.

3

Moments, not adjectives

Open prompts capture the specific minute, not a mood.

4

Development report

The AI PDF ranks dimensions and proposes two changes.

🧭

How It Works

From copy to deliverable in four steps.

1

Set the dimensions and bands

Copy it in and set dimensions, session and cohort fields.

2

Collect after teaching

Learners answer while the session is still fresh.

3

Aggregate to review

Check the pattern before any report is shared.

4

Coach with the report

Hand the instructor the PDF and agree two changes.

👥

Who Is This For

Pick your role — see how it fits your workflow.

1

Training managers

Give an instructor a development plan instead of a score.

2

Faculty and program leads

Compare sessions on the same five dimensions.

3

Instructors

See what worked and what to change, in writing.

⭐

Key Features

What makes this template work as a professional deliverable.

📝

Sample Questions Inside

A preview of the real scored items - the published template weights them and writes one report per respondent.

  1. Explanations were clear and easy to follow (1-5)
  2. The instructor handled questions with confidence (1-5)
  3. I was asked questions that checked my understanding (1-5)
  4. Feedback I received told me what to change (1-5)
  5. Marking and expectations felt fair (1-5)
  6. Describe one moment that worked well (open)
  7. Describe one thing to change next time (open)
❓

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the feedback anonymous to the instructor?
Keep it that way: collect without identity fields and share only the aggregated report. Individual comments should be quoted without attribution.
How many responses do I need before acting?
Enough that a single unhappy respondent is not the verdict - set your own minimum per session and hold to it.
Does it evaluate teaching or the subject?
Both are captured: subject command and clarity are rated separately from questioning and feedback practice.
Can it be used in appraisal?
It is a development tool. If appraisal uses several measures, keep the report as one input, dated and contextualised.
Can we compare instructors?
Compare dimension patterns only after sufficient responses per person, and always in the same session type.
Do we need to rebuild it for the next group of learners?
Yes. Copy it into your FormLM workspace, set dimensions and sessions, and reuse it each cohort.

Turn feedback into a plan

Copy it free, aggregate first, then agree two changes with the instructor.