Get Started Free
🏠 Real Estate & Property

Free Property Management Satisfaction Template | FormLM

Rate the services residents actually meet — response, repairs, cleaning, security, communications, value — six dimensions plus a comment, monthly by building.

~3 min to answer
6 rated dimensions
Live Preview

Quick answer

Send it on a steady cadence, building by building: residents rate response, repairs, cleaning, security, communications and value, each with an open comment, so satisfaction trends rather than one-off complaints drive the fixes. It measures current residents' perception — read it alongside retention and complaint data for the fuller picture.

Disclaimer: feedback reflects residents' individual experience; act on monthly aggregates and safety flags, not single scores.

Six-dimension 1-5 service-quality scale plus verbatim, resident-experience standard.

💡

About this template

Property management reputations live in corridors and reply times, not in annual reports. This survey scores the resident-facing stack across six dimensions — response speed, repair quality, common-area cleaning, security presence, communications clarity and fee value — with one open comment per answer. Aggregated monthly by building, it tells managers which of the six is quietly burning, and gives boards evidence at fee-review time.

🖥️

Live Preview

Sample form preview (fillable once the app is published).

loading...
…
Fill it in to see how responses flow.
📦

What's Included

Everything you need to run this template.

1

Response speed

From report to acknowledged.

2

Repair quality

Fixed right, fixed once.

3

Common areas

Cleaning, lighting, greens.

4

Security feel

Presence, access, night comfort.

5

Communications

Notices early and in plain terms.

6

Fee value

What the money bought.

🧭

How It Works

From copy to deliverable in four steps.

1

Use this template

Quarterly pulse, monthly light.

2

Resident answers in minutes

Six sliders, one comment.

3

Watch by building

Averaged per property.

4

Reply with actions

Published fixes close the loop.

👥

Who Is This For

Pick your role — see how it fits your workflow.

1

Property managers

Rank fixes by signal.

2

HOA and strata boards

Fee debates with data.

3

Residents

Scored once, heard properly.

⭐

Key Features

What makes this template work as a professional deliverable.

📝

Sample Questions Inside

A preview of real questions — the full version lets you customize every field.

  1. How quickly are issues you report acknowledged? (1-5)
  2. Repairs completed — right the first time? (1-5)
  3. Common-area cleaning and lighting standard (1-5)
  4. How safe does the building feel at night? (1-5)
  5. Are notices timely and easy to understand? (1-5)
  6. Value received for the management fee (1-5)
  7. The one service you would fix first
❓

Frequently Asked Questions

How often should residents be asked?
A light monthly pulse plus one full quarterly review; beyond that, survey fatigue turns your best evidence base into empty charts.
Won't scores skew to the angry?
Some will — which is why the aggregate is trended per building, and comments carry a severity tag to route real safety issues instantly to staff.
Should the results be published?
Yes, in summary: a visible response to one named complaint does more for trust than any satisfaction number.
How is this different from a maintenance-job survey?
The job survey scores one work order; this scores the relationship — the cleaning, the notices and the night feeling between tickets.
Do small buildings need this?
A 20-unit building is five comments from reputation change; the form takes the same fifteen minutes either way.
Can boards compare buildings over time?
Yes — identical dimensions and scale make month-on-month, property-on-property comparison legitimate.

Hear the corridors before they talk

Six dimensions per building, one monthly signal you can act on.