Collect structured feedback on a draft proposal from your team or the client — clarity, fit, objection surface and price reaction — before the final send.
Quick answer
A structured review of a draft proposal by your team or the client — clarity, fit, objections and price reaction — captured before the final send.
Proposals are graded by readers who never tell you the grade. This review form puts the draft in front of chosen reviewers — internal red-team or, post-submission, the client themselves — capturing structured answers: Is the problem understood? Does the solution follow? Where is the price uncomfortable? Which objection will they raise? The collected feedback becomes the revision list before stakes get real, and reviewer patterns expose systemic proposal weaknesses.
A fillable sample form preview — live once the app is published.
Everything you need to run this template.
Clarity judged by actual readers, not the writer.
The question they will ask, collected before they ask it.
Revision lists ranked by reviewer consensus.
Stored reviews accumulate your proposal's real weaknesses.
From copy to deliverable in four steps.
Copy the form per live proposal.
Two or three colleagues review the draft.
Where the relationship allows, ask the buyer's view.
Fix what multiple readers flagged, then send.
Pick your role — see how it fits your workflow.
Stop sending work graded in silence.
See which sections lose deals repeatedly.
Add a documented review gate before submission.
What makes this template work as a professional deliverable.
A preview of the fields inside — everything stays editable once you copy the template.
