Interviewers score every candidate on the same dimensions, with evidence per rating — a comparable, defensible hire / no-hire record.
Quick answer
Same candidate, different yardsticks — every rater uses the same dimensions with mandatory written evidence, disagreement is preserved not averaged, and the AI page lands a defensible hire recommendation.
Unstructured interviews feel decisive and predict little. This form gives every interviewer the same dimensions — role skills, experience evidence, working style, motivation — with a rating and written evidence for each, so the hiring team compares candidates side by side and defends decisions with records instead of gut feel.
| Template | Structured Interview Assessment |
|---|---|
| Category | HR & People Ops |
| Format | Scored assessment with personalized AI PDF report |
| Time to complete | About 10 minutes per response |
| What you get | A personalized AI report (printable PDF) for every response, plus the raw answers |
| Best for | Hiring managers · Recruiters · Interview panel members |
| Cost | Free to copy and customize on FormLM |
Sample form and AI report preview (fillable once the app is published).
Everything you need to run this template.
Every interviewer scores the same dimensions, defined before the interview.
Each score requires the answer or example it came from.
Candidates compare by dimension, not by who interviewed last.
Scores, spread between raters and a suggested verdict, as a PDF.
From copy to deliverable in four steps.
Copy it free and fix your dimensions per role family.
Ten minutes after each interview, while the evidence is fresh.
See each candidate across interviewers; disagreement stays visible.
The hire / no-hire record answers “why” months later.
Pick your role — see how it fits your workflow.
Stop panels debating vibes; rank on evidence.
Bring real structure to hiring managers’ scoring.
A short form beats a blank feedback page.
What makes this template work as a professional deliverable.
A preview of real questions — the full version adds scoring and a personalized report per respondent.
