Get Started Free
🧑‍💼 HR & People Ops

Free Team Health Assessment Template

The team anonymously rates psychological safety, clarity, dependency, feedback and delivery rhythm, and an AI report shows where views diverge before the retro.

5 dimensions
anonymous
divergence report
Live Preview

Quick answer

When a team stumbles, resist diagnosing individuals — the team rates psychological safety, dependency and clarity anonymously, low scores require behavioural examples, and the disagreement fits on one page.

💡

About this template

Friction a team never names just ferments in silence. This assessment has everyone answer anonymously on five dimensions drawn from widely used team-effectiveness research — psychological safety, goal and role clarity, working dependencies, feedback flow, delivery rhythm — with a short behavior example behind every low score. The AI report aggregates at team level and highlights where views diverge most, giving the retro its first agenda item. It is a facilitation snapshot, not a tool for evaluating individuals.

🗂️

Template at a Glance

TemplateTeam Health Assessment
CategoryHR & People Ops
FormatScored assessment with personalized AI PDF report
Time to completeAbout 10 minutes per response
What you getA personalized AI report (printable PDF) for every response, plus the raw answers
Best forTeam leads and scrum masters · HR business partners · Team members
CostFree to copy and customize on FormLM
🖥️

Live Preview

Sample form and AI report preview (fillable once the app is published).

loading...
…
Fill it in to see how responses flow.
loading...
…
Sample AI report with scoring visuals and recommendations, printable as a PDF.
📦

What's Included

Everything you need to run this template.

1

Five dimensions

Safety, clarity, dependency, feedback, rhythm on 1–5 anchors.

2

Anonymous ratings

Same bar for everyone; no names in the report.

3

Behavior examples

Every low score carries what it actually looked like.

4

AI divergence report

One page that opens the retro with the spread on the table.

🧭

How It Works

From copy to deliverable in four steps.

1

Use this template

Copy it and set the team and the review cycle.

2

Everyone answers

Five dimensions, 1–5 with a short behavior example each.

3

Read the divergence

The AI report aggregates and highlights where views split.

4

Fix one rule

The retro picks a single working change and schedules the re-check.

👥

Who Is This For

Pick your role — see how it fits your workflow.

1

Team leads and scrum masters

Open the retro with data instead of the loudest voice.

2

HR business partners

Spot which teams need facilitation help across the portfolio.

3

Team members

A signed-up channel to put real friction on the table.

⭐

Key Features

What makes this template work as a professional deliverable.

📝

Sample Questions Inside

A preview of real questions — the full version adds scoring and a personalized report per respondent.

  1. Team name and review cycle (fields)
  2. It is safe to take risks on this team (1–5 + example)
  3. I know exactly what is expected of me here (1–5)
  4. Dependencies between my work and teammates' are handled smoothly (1–5)
  5. Feedback flows in both directions without drama (1–5)
  6. The team ships at a predictable rhythm (1–5)
  7. The one thing to change first (open)
❓

Frequently Asked Questions

How often should a team run this?
Quarterly works for most teams — fast enough to catch drift, slow enough to see whether fixes actually landed.
How is a team health check different from an engagement survey?
Engagement surveys track how individuals feel over time; this snapshots how one team works together, read as a spread of views inside that team.
And how is it different from a manager effectiveness 360?
A 360 evaluates one leader. Team health evaluates the system — including how the leader behaves — so a low score points at a shared pattern, not a person.
Is it really anonymous?
Responses stay aggregated and the report is read at team level. With very small teams, keep questions behavioral so answers can't be traced to one voice.
What do we do with a low score?
Put the widest divergence on the retro agenda and change one working rule. The assessment is a conversation starter, not a verdict.
Is it free to use?
Yes. Copy it into your FormLM workspace and run it at your next sprint boundary.
📚

Methods & terminology behind this template

eNPS 360-degree feedback Likert scale Retention risk assessment guide Employee engagement guide

Turn quiet friction into one agenda item

Copy it free and open the next retro with the spread on the table.