Registers the decision a research engagement must serve: decision question, owners, stakeholders, objective, intended use of findings, success criteria, evidence already held, plus start date and review cadence.
Quick answer
Registers the decision a research engagement must serve: decision question, owners, stakeholders, objective, intended use of findings, success criteria, evidence already held, plus start date and review cadence.
Projects drift when nobody wrote down what success looked like. This register fixes that at engagement start: seventeen fields covering the engagement name and start date, the decision the work must serve, who decides and who signs off, the stakeholders and their needs, current context, the research objective, how findings will be used, the success metric and how it is measured, the risk of getting the decision wrong, evidence already held, open items, priority, owner, review cadence and notes. The project is then measured against the target it set rather than against memory.
Live form preview — fill it in to see how each answer is captured and exported.
Everything you need to run this template.
One field for the decision the work must inform, before objectives.
The metric that will prove it, who sets it and who signs off.
Decision makers, stakeholders, their needs and current context.
Engagement start date plus a weekly-to-quarterly review rhythm.
From copy to deliverable in four steps.
Copy the form into your FormLM workspace — free.
Client answers; agency records.
Agree how each number is measured.
Score progress against the original entry.
Pick your role — see how it fits your workflow.
Start every account with a written target.
Anchor engagements to defined wins.
End "what were we optimizing for?" drift.
What makes this template work as a professional deliverable.
A preview of real questions — the full version lets you customize every field.