Self-assesses an instrument against four reliability axes — coverage, stability, internal consistency and item clarity — with 12 weighted statements and an AI PDF report that ranks where the questionnaire is weakest.
Quick answer
Self-assesses an instrument against four reliability axes — coverage, stability, internal consistency and item clarity — with 12 weighted statements and an AI PDF report that ranks where the questionnaire is weakest.
A survey inherits every flaw of its questions. Before fielding, this self-assessment walks the instrument through twelve weighted 1–5 statements grouped into the four reliability axes — Coverage (does it address the whole construct without gaps), Stability (would answers hold on retest, is wording unambiguous, is the format reproducible), Internal Consistency (do items in a dimension measure the same underlying thing) and Item Clarity — plus the respondent name. The AI PDF report bands each axis and names the weakest, so rewrite effort lands on the property that will actually move the data rather than on gut feel about individual wordings.
Live form and AI report preview — fill it in and the report is generated from your answers.
Everything you need to run this template.
Coverage, stability, internal consistency, item clarity.
The instrument assessed on stated properties, not vibes.
The AI PDF bands each axis and ranks where to rewrite first.
Run it on the draft, fix the weak axis, then field.
From copy to deliverable in four steps.
Copy the audit into your FormLM workspace — free.
Score coverage, stability, consistency and clarity.
Honest low scores save the field wave.
Fix that axis, then re-run before fielding.
Pick your role — see how it fits your workflow.
Catch flaws before respondents do.
Defend an instrument cleanly.
Standardize instrument review.
What makes this template work as a professional deliverable.
A preview of real questions — the full version adds scoring and a personalized report per respondent.
